Media Centre
Mutuality
Building societies and mutuality
All building societies are mutual institutions. Therefore people who have a savings account, or mortgage, are members and have certain rights to vote and receive information, as well as to attend and speak at meetings. Each member has one vote, regardless of how much money they have invested or borrowed or how many accounts they may have. This means building societies are solely focussed on delivering the best services and products to their members. This is in contrast to banks, who have a split loyalty between making a profit to deliver dividends to shareholders and delivering value for their customers. The total management expenses of converted institutions are usually about 35% more than they otherwise would be once dividend payments to shareholders are taken into account.
During the 1990s a number of building societies demutualised to become banks. A report by MPs published in March 2006 was critical of these demutualisations.
Demutualised building societies
BSA Submission to the APPG Enquiry into the True Cost of Demutualisation
Windfalls or Shortfalls? The True Cost of Demutualisation
Shareholder Ownership Forces Branch Closures
Key benefits of building societies
The key benefits of building societies' mutual status are as follows
- They do not pay dividends to shareholders, and accordingly are able to operate on narrower margins than plc banks. This means that, overall, building societies offer lower mortgage rates and higher savings rates than their competitors.
- They are more likely to maintain their branch networks than banks, as they can take into account non-financial factors when assessing whether to open or close branches. Bank branch numbers have been reduced much more rapidly than building societies' in recent years.
- They can take into account much longer term issues when determining corporate strategy than institutions constantly under pressure to deliver rising dividends and a rising share price.
- They can influence, favourably, the pricing policy of their competitors. For example, pressure from building societies has prevented banks charging for access to cash machines
- The UK has a much stronger financial services environment through the diversity which building societies offer. They are based all over the UK, rather than in the City of London, which is the home of most financial institutions, and this gives them a different perspective.
- They are much closer to consumer needs and aspirations because of their ownership structure. Building society staff know that when they serve a customer they are serving one of the owners of the business. This ensures a completely different culture in building societies compared to institutions owned by shareholders.
Mutuality - BSA Articles
Rachel Blackmore's speech at the Labour Party Conference 2006
Rachel Snow's speech to the BSA/Mutuo fringe meeting at the Labour Party Conference- Mutuality - Where are we now?
It is ten years since Cheltenham & Gloucester Building Society was taken over by (the then) Lloyds Bank PLC in August 1995. With the first demutualisation taking place with Abbey National in 1989, post ’95 saw a wave of flotations, with eight more building societies taking the decision to become a plc.
